Dear Editor,
It is a shallow academic gobbledegook — that anti-Modi Editorial. I will bury the writer with a mountain of facts for him to see how he also falls into the category of the brainwashed Western-centric apologists who cannot see the forest for the trees.
He claims to be, as he says, “As someone who drinks deeply from the well of Santan Dharma, it pains me to see its flagrant weaponization by a political party” smacks of duplicity. Did it pain him when numerous Hindus were butchered when Nurpur Sharma had the courage to state a factual account of Mohamaned – a revered prophet of 1.8 billion – marrying a 5-year-old and having sex with her when she was only nine years old? Nurpur Sharma is still in hiding and will have to live like this, perhaps, for the rest of her life.
I would like to see where he has had the courage to, as he states, “True dharma, on the other hand, is one that would strengthen our conscience to call out censorship, bullying, hatemongering, lynching, and killings in the name of religion”, actually stand up in support of his ‘True Dharma’ when Hindus in Kashmir were unceremoniously faced with genocidal persecutions and kicked out of the homeland. Also, he should investigate what love Jihad is doing to the vulnerable Hindu girls. Also, the tens of thousands of Madrassas in India are, in fact, programming young Muslim children about hate, Jihad, and the glory of a paradise for them to become brainwashed warriors for Allah. Does he write editorials to expose these truths, or does he value his head more? These are the weaklings who dare not cross the line with the Muslims, with even a buzz, but would try to show their muddled intelligence as protectors of a democracy that is still a convenient political tool, as we see with the mighty USA.
The fact is, Hindu Dharma, by its very nature, subscribes to freedom of thought and expression. Modi has, thankfully, restored India’s vibrant democracy from a congress that was, in fact, a Christian theocracy under Sonia Gandhi. She and her goons had installed Christians to take control of the Hindu temples. She was a facade garbed as a Hindu for votes but favoured her Catholicism and raised her children to become like her and the entire Nehru clan. No doubt, he was blind to this with his incoherent ramblings.
Perhaps he would rather see India sink into the hellhole that Pakistan has become, or maybe he would prefer to see Xi Jinping, instead of Modi, as the leader of India.
How do these fools come up with their cockeyed editorials? Send him to the Himalayas so that the clean air will clear the fog from his polluted brain.
Cliff Rajkumar