The construction of a Hindu Krishna Temple in Islamabad, Pakistan was halted recently not through some terrorist group but through legal means at the behest of Muslim leaders and activists. The Prime Minister of Pakistan allocated land and money to build the Krishna Mandir to be the first Hindu Temple in the City Islamabad, Pakistan to be built since 1947. That means no temples (mandirs) were allowed to be built in the Islamic state since Independence under their Islamic law, and this is their capital city. Under the 1991 Enforcement of Shariat Act, Shariah Law was declared the Supreme Law of Pakistan.
Muslims in Pakistan shouted slogans of “Kill all Hindus!” and so did many children in reference to stopping the temple being built. They threatened to kill all Hindus and feed them to the dogs.They threatened to kill a cow and spill its blood on the site of the Krishna Temple during Eid-Ul-Adha to desecrate the site. This (cow killing and mutilation) is an act that Islamic invaders have been practicing since destroying Hindu places since 712 CE and continues to happen even in Hindu majority India to insult Hindus. The site of the temple was vandalized and material such as a tonne of iron to build the temple was stolen from the area, all of which was donated by the Hindu community. Such atrocity to build one temple in a place that has not allowed any Mandirs to be built since 1947. Jamia Ashrafia, a Muslim religious leader said construction of the temple was “not permissible in Islam.” If new temples can’t be built what about the older ones? The older temples in Islamabad like the Ram Kund area temple had been converted to a restaurant and beef was openly served, Hindus were not allowed to pray or visit. Another 1000 year old temple of Varun Deva in Karachi, Pakistan is used as a public toilet/ latrine. In fact a Pakistani TV station delighted in helping demolish the temple.
This Hinduphobia should give rise to different schools of logic. The number one logic of Muslims fanatics like Ulema Mashaikh Federation of Pakistan [ UMF ] is by issuing Islamic Laws called Fatwa to stop the construction of the Krishna Temple by stating Pakistan cannot build new temples but only renovate ancient temples because Pakistan is an Islamic State. These Islamic Scholars are sugar coating their hate for any Hindus, Hinduism and Hindu Temples in Pakistan. So while many think Fatwas are only issued under ISIS these are actually everyday occurrences in Islamic states supported by their people. Pakistan’s P.M. Imran khan was then forced to recant his offer for the temple and then said he referred the matter to a Council of Islamic Ideology for consideration.
The second logic is not sugar coated as it entails laws, permits, but a more bold Islamic teaching which I appreciated more for its potential for better debates. These two characters Mr. Malik Shani Awan, a news caster on Pakistan TV and Punjab Pakistan Assembly Speaker Mr. Chaudhry Pervaiz – Elahi made it abundantly understood there should be NO HINDU TEMPLE in ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN because it’s simply UN – ISLAMIC. Islam has no room and tolerance of any other religion especially religions like Hinduism which is considered Kaffir (unbeliever, idol worshipper) and this is their bold declaration. Muslims constantly declare in the West of Islam’s great tolerance but here it is, 1400 years later there is none. As Pakistanis and Bangladeshis have been converted by the sword, the tolerance of a convert for their original faith is worse than their Arab masters.
Before any court decision could be made, Mr. Malik Shani Awan broke the walls of the Hindu Temple instantly becoming a famous hero by the Islamic Clerics / Mullahs with the regular popular support of the main population throughout Pakistan. Mr. Malik S. Awan shouted by the grace of Allah the Temple will not be built. The Punjab Assembly Speaker Mr. Chaudhry Pervaiz call for an even more interesting debate I could not resist.
Mr. Chaudhry Pervaiz’s logic is grounded in that Pakistan in 1947 was created to protect the IDENTITY of Muslims and building a Hindu Temple in Islamabad, Pakistan was an INSULT to Prophet Mohammed’s CONQUEST of MECCA where the Prophet Mohammed destroyed all the IDOLS in the Kaaba and wanted nothing to do with idol-worshipers. This ongoing debate leads me to the question of why would the Prophet Mohammed will be upset of a Pakistan that never existed while many of his followers / family fled to the LAND of BHARAT full of IDOL worshipers.
The Land of Bharat (India’s name for India) was / is given to Hindus / Sanatanists by our ancient and Vedic Gods like Rama and Krishna to practice the Vedic culture throughout the Sub – Continent of South East Asia that includes India, Bangladesh AND Pakistan and other parts of that region. The culture and religion [Vedic ways ] was designed and choreographed by our Hindu Gods and Rishis to suit the South East Asian Sub – Continent based on their historical narratives which gave rise to the land of Bharat and their democratic civilizations.
Similarly, the Prophet Mohammed through his many revelations choreographed and designed Islam to unite the Arab world by means of their historical narratives. In the land of Bharat [ India, Pakistan, Bangladesh ] no one has the right to tell those who subscribe to the indigenous Vedic culture of Bharat they cannot build a Hindu Temple, especially on land that was meant for Hindus, given to Hindus and where Hinduism originated through the Indian race.
Off course none of this was highlighted by the mainstream media which regularly likes to call Modi, India and Hindus extremists. The media made a mountain out of Modi’s recent CAA (Citizenship Amendment Act/ Bill) which gave some refuge to Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists and Christians facing death, genocide, rape, murder, torture in these Islamic neighbourly nations like Pakistan and Bangladesh. However, they twisted the narrative and claimed Modi is a dictator and a Hindu strongman because he also did not let in all Muslims from these countries into India which is unfair. Their logic is staggering hypocrisy. Widespread protests broke out in India leading to the Delhi riots recently in which Muslims in India demanded Muslims be let in to the expense of Hindu refugees. Wikipedia banned Hindus from updating their site on the Hindus killed while U.S. Presidential hopeful, at the time, Bernie Sanders called it Anti-Muslim riots. This is what the liberal mainstream media did to Hindus and what they continue to do in India and globally. The media frames India and Hindus in twisted and false narratives. Let’s not forget that India now has over 300 000 mosques which get state funding, imams get lofty salaries and they get 70% Hajj subsidy funded by Hindu temples. Yes you read that right. They want democracy in US, UK, Europe and India but give none.
Hare Krishna , Hare Rama
Wake up West Indian Hindus!