Site icon Indo Caribbean Diaspora News

Strategy for small parties and change

ravi-dev

Photo : Ravi Dev

ROAR of Ravi Dev

In January 2005, with elections a year away, I proposed a “Center Force” strategy for the plethora of smaller parties then around – three with single seats in Parliament ROAR, GAP, WPA, plus the JFAP, Unity Party and Vision Guyana, plus individuals who would soon form the AFC.  We are at a similar juncture again and I proffer the advice against the background that it was rejected then but the “Third Force” that emerged died in stillbirth, for several reasons but primarily because most believe they could work with either the PNC or PPP but not insist on together.

“ROAR entered the political realm to place on the national agenda, two home truths: that our present politics are dominated by ethnic insecurities and that we have to create a political system that would accommodate all the chosen representatives of the various groups in Guyana to deal with those insecurities. The first truth is now generally accepted by all and sundry – including most of the political representatives. The second is also generally accepted…so what’s the problem? The problem is one of credible representation of ethnic groups through the presence of their chosen representatives in the PPP and PNC. They believe they can address ethnic insecurities by co-option of ethnic individuals under a “Civic” and “Big Tent” labels respectively.

ROAR believes that the latter proposals falls short smaller parties working with either one of the two dominant parties would inevitably leave the other out. It is unlikely to expect Guyana will have social peace if either of the two major parties are out of the picture. It is also improbable to expect that any other party will displace either of them at the next election. So how do we avert our tsunami of conflict?

ROAR believes it is time for a “Centre Force” to be created and nurtured. What is this Centre Force? For one, it’s not a “Third Force” that feels it can wish away the PPP and PNC. It’s a Force that should seek to occupy the political, social, and cultural ground between the PPP and PNC – hence “Centre”. Today in Guyana, there are a number of  political parties outside the ambit of the PPP and the PNC – ROAR, GAP, WPA, JFAP, etc. that can begin the process of creating this Centre Force. These could be joined the parties now in formation by other committed Guyanese. What would be some of the incentives for these parties to work together?

Firstly, the ineffectuality of the opposition (including the PNC) to influence the formation of policy should be an object lesson to those who believe that “Westminster” politics can work in Guyana.  Secondly, the experience of The United Force both with the PNC (1964-1968) and PPP (2001-present) demonstrates the inadvisability of the smaller parties seeking a coalition arrangement with either the PPP or the PNC. There’s the matter of “the disequilibrium of size” when it comes to coalitions between parties of vastly different strengths. It matters not the good intentions of the parties to the coalitions. If a mosquito joins forces with an elephant it should not be surprised when it is taken for granted or even ignored during crucial decisions. There’s the iron law of oligarchy – in all organizations power will accrete in the hands of a few – and we can be sure the few won’t come from the ranks of the mosquitoes.

 What would be the ground rules for a Centre Force? Firstly, they should not get together simply to deny the PPP or the PNC the government. This would result in an “coalition of convenience” that would quickly and acrimoniously fall asunder. They will have to be committed to a common programme to form a “coalition of commitment”. This does not mean they agree on each and every point. That they are different parties mean that they do not. There’s nothing wrong with this…and in fact there’s everything right with it.

 The way forward is a confederation of parties, where they keep their identities as they work together to craft a common and truly national program (because of their diversity) for Guyana. In the crafting of such a programme it is possible (and in our estimation quite likely) that much common ground can be found. But it will also demonstrate to the Guyanese people that there are compromises each of the small parties are willing to make to work together for Guyana and not just preaching it to the PPP and PNC individually.

Facebook Comments Box
Exit mobile version