A case in Toronto earlier this month of a black West Indian couple brutalizing a 59 year-old Indian woman in a home invasion brought back nightmare visions to some Indo Caribbeans here.
The couple came to rob armed with a handgun and found the Indian woman alone in the house, apparently offering no resistance. What resistance can you offer to people armed with a handgun?
They robbed her but also gave the Indian woman a proper beating, so that she suffered two broken orbital bones in the head, a broken nose, a broken jaw, sprained thumb, a broken ankle and a concussion.
We all saw something here which we know is part of the behavioural psychology of black criminals attacking Indian victims in Trinidad and Guyana.
The black criminal in those Caribbean countries is not content with robbing the Indian victim of his/her valuables, but he thinks he has to brutalize the Indians, break their face, cut them, shoot them, break some bones, rape the females, damage property. Exactly as if he is taking vengeance on somebody who has wronged him, taken away something of value from him, so in robbing and beating the Indian he is not committing a crime but just taking back what is his due.
So what could this stranger, this Indian man or woman have taken away from a black criminal he does not know? Aha, there’s the rub. It’s not that a particular Indian victim has taken something from a particular black criminal. The black man believes that the Indian race has taken away money and opportunity from the black race many years ago, and the Indian race continues to enjoy that advantage over black people today, as evidenced by the relatively greater wealth, education and progress of the Indians vis a vis the blacks.
But this is madness, Nobel prize level gobar! What kind of idiot would believe such nonsense? Friends, I never said the black race was sensible and rational. As a group they believe this foolishness and the black criminals believe it double.
So what do they believe we Indians took from them? It’s quite a list.
Firstly, when Indians came to work the abandoned sugar estates and replace the former African slaves, it is believed we acted as strikebreakers and denied black people the chance to negotiate with the planters for better wages and working conditions.
All of this is complete rubbish, as the ex-slaves had promptly abandoned work on the sugar estates under any conditions, most had fled the areas near the estates and gone to the towns, a few squatting on crown lands in distant places like Moruga in Trinidad.
When the Indians came the estates were abandoned, as waves of Chinese, Portuguese, even free Europeans had failed to supply the needed labour efficiently. This strikebreaker stuff has no legs but the black criminal and many black people today still have it in their collective consciousness.
Secondly, the blacks say when slavery ended the slave owners were compensated for their loss, but the slaves got nothing. They say when their term of indentureship ended, the Indians got free land or a free return passage to India, meaning we got something but the ex-slaves got nothing. Now we Indians had nothing to do with ex-slaves not getting compensation, we were not even in the country! The land that some of the Indians got was not freeness, but an exchange for their free return passage to India guaranteed in the indentureship contract.
Thirdly, the blacks say openly that under slavery the slaves were denied the chance to practice their cultural heritage, keep their religion, their names, keep their families together, and were sold as property, brutalized, raped, even killed at will. The Indians were allowed to keep their culture, their religion, their families and so on under indentureship and after. So we Indians got a benefit the black slaves did not.
Again, words fail me at the breadth of this black nincompoopery. We Indians were not there during slavery and had nothing to do with the treatment of slaves. Under indenture we were not slaves for life, property without rights, but contract labourers doing a short term job for wages under specified working conditions. Why should a stupid black criminal a hundred years later be breaking my bones for this?
Fourthly, and this is the one that black people will never admit anywhere, black people are furious at how they see us Indians excluding them, refusing to see them as our brothers and sisters, not accepting them as equals, and worse of all, generally declining to mate and marry and propagate with them.
Black people hate rejection more than any reaction, and sexual rejection drives them mad. Black people generally prefer to mate with other races if they get the opportunity, to produce children who are less African in appearance, with better hair, features and skin colour.
In Trinidad and Guyana, the whites, Chinese, Portuguese and other desirable groups are tiny in number and mostly unapproachable, but the Indians are there in numbers, ideal candidates for the black suicide through sex plan. Yet we refuse to cooperate with the plan and the existence of only 7% douglas in Trinidad is evidence the plan is not working.
Yes, I know the black criminal is not consciously rationalizing this while he is breaking my hated Indian face but it’s there in his subconscious better believe it.
I have more reasons, but these four should be enough for now to infuriate any black Caribbean person or any politically correct Indo Caribbean.
I contrast this black rage with the behaviour of the Canadian criminal, whether European, Chinese, Ukrainian, Filipino, Latino, native, whatever. He may break down my door to rob me, he may stick me up with a gun for my wallet or my car, but I have little fear he will break my face or shoot me unless I am resisting his robbery. He has no vengeance to inflict on me.
So I say with as straight a face as I can manage, if I am to be robbed here in Canada, let it be a white man or an Asian man or a gentle Filipino, anybody but a black man! My cousins in Trinidad and Guyana don’t have that kind of choice.