Since Mr. Paray’s announcement last week that he was throwing his hat in the ring for the leadership of the UNC he has rather predictably come under a fierce attack from the supporters of the status quo and the present leader, Mrs. Persad Bissessar. It is almost as though she has indicated that anyone who doesn’t openly and vigorously support her will be deemed to be against her and will, as a consequence, lose the chance of sharing in the country’s largesse when – they hope – that she becomes Prime Minister again.
The attacks on Mr. Paray have ranged from the sublime to the ridiculous. For example, one of the attacks on him is that he used to be a member of the PNM. Unspoken, but clearly intended, the message is that as a result of this he cannot be trusted and a vote for him will obviously be a vote for the PNM. Actually, some sycophants have even gone so far as to articulate that thought.
But those pushing that line have not bothered to say that as the Member of Parliament for the Mayaro constituency Mr. Paray had to go through the party’s screening committee – not once, but twice! If this was such a bad thing then what does that say about the screening committee which is under the control of –guess who? – Kamla Persad Bissessar! If this is such a bad thing then does that mean that previous membership in a political party that opposes the UNC is a good reason to bar that person from the leadership of the UNC? Is that implied in the UNC’s constitution? In other words, if you made a mistake once in joining another political party you always have to pay for it?
But, wait a minute! Didn’t Mrs. Persad Bissessar actually not only belong to another political party (the COP) but actually ran against the UNC as a candidate for that party? So? Is this a case of “do as I say but not as I do”?
Of course, it has to be noted that absolutely no evidence – whether real or fabricated – has been produced to support this allegation. But Heinrich Himmler’s injunction about ‘the bigger the lie the more people will believe it’ is what is important here. (For those who don’t remember, Himmler was Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Minister of Propaganda.)
It would be a nice thing if the UNC (and especially those who support Mrs. Persad Bissessar) would deal with the issues rather than making personal and often baseless attacks. A proper debate on the issues surrounding the leadership is most necessary at this time. And these issues begin and end with the economy. Then we have other issues like health care, the water supply and crime. What are the proposals from Mrs. Persad Bissessar? What are they from Mr. Paray? Who comes across to you as a person who can lead the UNC to victory at the polls? Who has a history of losing?
Is it possible, do you think, to have a calm and rational debate on the issues rather than the hurling of brickbats at those with whose opinions we don’t agree with?
P.S. In my last post I misspelled Mr. Paray’s name many times. I do sincerely apologize for that mistake.
Robin Montano
http://robinmontano.blogspot.com/2024/03/rushton-paray-part-two.html
